Tissue perfusion is a major concern for people with disabilities who use wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility because carbon dioxide builds up as the metabolic processes—the way the body maintains its chemical balance—power down. In their research, Bogie et al. have suggested thresholds for risk to tissue viability (Bogie et al., 1992, 1995). That’s why, for people with impaired central nervous systems, a range of “alternative” seating surfaces—like gel and air bladder technologies—have been developed for use in rehabilitation, and wheelchair users are taught to do pressure relief push-ups.
In able-bodied sitters, the nervous system is a good indicator of what feels comfortable, informing the body to respond when it’s necessary to accommodate tissue perfusion. / See figure 2 / It only takes about 30 minutes—or less—before a sitter begins to fidget, thanks to the nervous system. Physiologically, fidgeting is what allows the blood to flow through the previously compressed tissues, reestablishing more efficient tissue perfusion. In this respect, a little bit of fidgeting is good, acting as a sort of micro-movement that shifts the pressure off one section of tissue and allowing some blood to reach it. It can take about three minutes for this exchange to clear out all the carbon dioxide and replace it with fresh oxygen. (Makhsous et al., 2007)
However, when people become so uncomfortable that they have to get out of their chair to relieve the pressure on their tissues, it becomes problematic because they’re likely disengaging from their work. That disengagement can translate to a loss of productivity. A well-designed chair seat will enhance this comfort, distributing the body’s seated pressure over a large area, and allowing the sitter to remain comfortably engaged.
People already sit too long and too often in static postures when they work, especially while engaging with computer technology. When they sit without moving they stress their body’s tissues, becoming more uncomfortable, more tired, and less productive.
By passively stimulating the tissues that bear the pressure load, a body can maintain a better exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide, resulting in better function and performance. Dynamic surface pressure on a chair seat—a surface that accommodates the body’s micro-movements—provides more comfort, liveliness, and health-positive benefits to the sitter than non-dynamic surface pressure.
Movement is the key to good health, especially when a person is seated. The postural range and shape of a work chair help the sitter move physiologically. Beyond these features, the Embody work chair provides zoned support. These targeted support areas in the thighs and pelvis work in concert to conform to the sitter’s body shape. Within these zones are different proportions of tissue—bone and flesh—that need varying levels of support.
The Embody chair supports these variances in tissue—from the popliteal crease at the back of each knee to the sitting bones and all the soft tissue in between—reducing stress on muscles, bones, and skin. The bi-compliant support structure of the Embody chair’s seat—one that includes both a global and a local spring layer—fits the sitter’s body shape, moving with the person as he or she changes position. / See figure 3 / This contoured, layered design allows for air to flow through the textiles and provides superior thermal comfort.
The seat’s Pixelated Support system is designed as a matrix. Each component, or pixel, inherently conforms to the sitter’s weight, distributing the mass evenly on the seat and providing a sensory experience of flotation. The pixels adapt to micro-movements in the shifting of the sitter’s weight. In other words, the chair accommodates—even encourages—movement to enable tissue perfusion, reducing stress on muscles, bones, and skin.
To test the benefit of distributing seated pressure, a prototype with a bi-compliant seat was compared to foam or suspension seat constructions to measure the tissue perfusion of 15 female subjects. Except for an earlier pilot, this is the first known study of tissue perfusion in any population of able-bodied users.
In addition to the standing posture, subjects were randomly rotated through 10-minute sitting trials in each of five different chair solutions including the bi-compliant prototype. Surface oximeters were placed on the subjects’ skin at five locations. These locations would contact the seat surface when the subjects were seated. The oximeters recorded transcutaneous partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide from these areas, and sensors picked up the concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide electrochemically. Simultaneously, the seating contact pressure was recorded in the sitting area. The subjects sat with 90-degree angles at the knee and hip and ankle, their buttocks to the rear of the chair, and feet flat on the floor. And they were instructed not to shift position during the testing.
Under the ischial tuberosities, the prototype chair, Embody, was best at maintaining the oxygen levels measured in the unimpeded standing posture. / See figure 4 / Subjects’ average tissue oxygen perfusion levels at these locations were significantly higher while seated in the Embody chair than while seated in the Foam B and Suspension B chairs. Given the high pressures the buttock tissues are normally subjected to in the seated posture, these results suggest that Embody presents a healthier alternative. Furthermore, the Embody chair results most closely reflect those of the standing posture, where tissue oxygen perfusion levels are nearly identical across all three measurement locations: ischial tuberosities, proximal thigh, and middle thigh. This underlines the ability of the bi-compliant design of the Embody seat to spread the load across the seat, rather than concentrate it. (Makhsous et al., 2008)
Regarding tissue carbon dioxide perfusion, the Embody seat measured similar advantages over the other seats tested in the study. Again at the location under the ischial tuberosities, the Embody seat results were significantly better than three of the other chairs’ results: Suspension A, Suspension B, and Foam A. / See figure 5 / There were also significant differences between the suspension seats for this measure, underlining the performance differences between constructions that might appear interchangeable.
People are engaging more with computer technology everyday, making sitting more prevalent than ever. Prolonged sitting can impede the flow of blood, and ultimately the facilitation of tissue perfusion. Relieving seated pressure through innovative engineering aids the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide, improving the flow of oxygen. This, in turn, brings a healthier seated experience to the sitter, allowing people to stay focused and engaged with their work.
Bogie KM, Nuseibeh I, Bader DL. “Transcutaneous gas tensions in the sacrum during the acute phase of spinal cord injury.” Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1992; 2006, (1):1-6.
Bogie, KM, Nuseibeh I, Bader DL. “Early progressive changes in tissue viability in the seated spinal cord injured subject.” Paraplegia. 1995, 33(3):141-147.
Makhsous, M, Priebe, M, Rowles D, Zeigler M, Chen D, Lin F. “Measuring Tissue Perfusion During Pressure Relief Maneuvers: Insights into Preventing Pressure Ulcers.” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, May 2007, 30(5): 63-73.
Mahksous, M, Lin F. “Influence of chair designs on pressure distribution, tissue perfusion, and skin temperature,” Departments of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Northwestern University Study, 2008.
Championing research and creativity in the earliest phases of Herman Miller’s product development efforts, Gretchen Gscheidle leads the team that explores unmet customer needs and responds to strategic questions identified by various organizational leaders. As the research link in all of the company’s seating introductions beginning with the Aeron chair in 1994, Gretchen has a strong record of participation and contribution in product development at Herman Miller. She is a member of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and represents Herman Miller on the Office Ergonomics Research Committee. Her research has been published in peer-reviewed journals. Gretchen earned a BFA in Industrial Design from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and graduated from Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering with a Master’s of Science in Product Design and Development.
The late Bill Stumpf studied behavioral and physiological aspects of sitting at work for more than 30 years. A specialist in the design of ergonomic seating, his designs include the Ergon chair, introduced by Herman Miller in 1976 and, with Don Chadwick, the equally innovative Equa and Aeron chairs. He contributed significantly to the design of the Embody chair prior to his death in 2006. In that same year, he posthumously received the National Design Award in Product Design presented by the Smithsonian’s Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum.
Jeff Weber credits his love of furniture design to working with Bill Stumpf, who designed for Herman Miller for 30 years. Weber joined forces with Stumpf’s Minneapolis firm in 1989. That led him to his association with Herman Miller. Weber worked with Stumpf on the Embody chair and, after Stumpf died in 2006, Weber evolved the design at his Minneapolis-based Studio Weber + Associates. In addition to the Embody chair, Weber’s designs for Herman Miller include the Intersect portfolio, Caper seating, and the Avive table collection.